Small Business Questions and Answers
1

I worked on some software that four people looked at (and signed the Non Disclosure Agreement (NDA)). One of the guys got hold of the source code and blatantly copied it.

When I met with a law firm it would have cost me and my business partner £40,000 to go to court and we may lose.

So my initial thought was what was the purpose of signing NDA even though I was screwed anyway.

flag

3 Answers

2

Contact the Business Software Alliance (www.bsa.org/GlobalHome.aspx) and Federation against Copyright Theft (www.fact-uk.org.uk/) for advice. They should be geared up to give you advice.

Note: As a new user I cannot add hyperlinks properly!

link|flag
1

NDA's and Non-Competes are notoriously difficult to take legal action against. As you mentioned the sheer cost of the lawsuit and appeal process could far outweigh the benefits of actually winning. But ultimately it is indeed a binding contract, and a valid one that can be very effective when you have the money there to enforce it. Typically, the judge does favor judgment to the complaining party.

One thing that I know can be done, at least in the US, is to file a motion with a court to ask it to issue an injunction against the offending party. Sometimes this can be done without a lawyer with a Magistrates court, but then be prepared for a back and forth, of we need more proof why I should issue this. If the software was blatantly stolen, it should be easy enough to show both applications side-by-side.

This then freezes their software application in it's tracks until the matter is resolved, either through an agreement or through the courts. Which, you might still never get damages because of the overall cost, but at least neither will the offending party.

Laws are different everywhere and you being from GB, so I can't speak to the validity of this method across the pond.

Note: I am not an attorney, and please seek one to validate any advice herein.

Hope this helps.

link|flag
Thanks for that. When your starting out you don't know this. – Ferdeen Oct 14 at 9:41
1

While I would never suggest that one should ever do without legal documentation when disclosing sensitive business information or ideas I have to agree that the enforcement of the NDA should the need arise is expensive, time consuming and difficult to see through.

To this end I would suggest that NDAs be used in conjunction with due dilligence and common sense. Perform background checks on any business or individual you're thinking about divulging information to. Ensure that they are trustworthy and more importantly only give away information vital to the context of the discussion you are currently having with them.

link|flag

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.